Sunday, May 31, 2009

Five Reasons to Be Terrified of Google Wave

 


wae

BY CHRIS DANNEN

Fri May 29, 2009 

 

Google Wave, announced today at Google's I/O Developer conference in San Francisco, is a hybridized email system that will fundamentally change the way we think about electronic messaging. This is foreboding for at least five reasons.

 

1) Participating in a Wave is a little like an email chain, and a little like instant messaging; you can embed documents, Google Web Elements, photos and other multimedia, and the whole bailywick is presented as one stream of conversation. People can jump in or jump out at any time, and they can track back to see how a conversation got started. 

 

The advantage, Google says, is "rich formatting." But this "formatting" is also a lot like instant message formatting. We all know what that'll mean: short, declarative sentences; loss of all punctuation, greetings, and email signatures (with important info like phone numbers); and conversations that are much longer than they should be. Dislike long billowy emails? You'll despise the bizarre, choppy prolixity of long waves.

 

2) "With live transmission as you type, participants on a wave can have faster conversations, see edits and interact with extensions in real-time." That's what Google says. Am I the only one who writes an email, then revises it for tone and clarity? It's creepy enough that other people know when I'm typing on Gtalk. Now they can see what I'm thinking as I try out sentences?

 

3) Every college student is familiar with the next liability. Email chains--the closest thing to waves at this point--are all fun and games until someone CC's the wrong person, like a parent, relative, boss or overly-sensitive co-worker. "Any participant can reply anywhere in the message, edit the content and add participants at any point in the process," Google says. That'll make keeping track of participants a lot harder. Subtract the aforementioned opportunities to self-edit, and you have a social trainwreck ready and waiting.


Picture 1

 

4) Google Wave, like all fun new toys on the Web these days, has its own API, aspiring to be a platform as well as a tool. It has "robots" that enable live functions like searching, linking and translation, and a wave can be embedded in a site to make things more "collaborative," according to Google.

 

Leaving aside spam for a second--which I realize is no trifle--what is it with platforms? How many of these things can we have before we all join hands across America? Any company with moderately ambitious developers is already trying to handle smartphone apps, Facebook's API, Twitter, widgets, and who knows how many other endeavors. Do we really need to throw another silo of communication on the pile?

 

5) The worst thing about Wave: I'm going to try it anyway. Google's apps are roundly excellent, with the exception of maybe Picasa, which is shamed by Flickr.

 

Why? I'm curious how Wave survived amidst a new, post-recession Google that cuts funding for pie-in-the-sky projects; obviously, Google really believes in Wave, and the search engine giant is rarely wrong about these things.

 

When Wave goes live "later this year," you can be the first to know--and resent--by signing up here. 

Source: http://www.fastcompany.com/blog/chris-dannen/techwatch/five-reasons-be-terrified-google-wave


 

Posted via web from Global Business News

Facebook’s New Russian Shareholder Planning Its Own IPO

 


image

By Robert Andrews - Thu 28 May 2009

 

Facebook may not be rushing to go public, but Digital Sky Technologies, the Russian investment fund that just paid $200 million for 1.96 percent of the social network, does plan to IPO.

 

CEO, co-founder and former Mail.ru chief Yuri Milner tells Slon.ru (via Yakov): “Our model ... is to exit via IPO ... An IPO’s timing is dependent on the state of world markets and the willingness of Digital Sky Technologies for the event ... I think it will happen within the next three years.” No info on this point, but it’s quite possible DST would float in London rather than Moscow.

 

DST was already a major-league online investor before buying part of Facebook, holding big interests in Russia’s leading portal Mail.ru, its top social nets Odnoklassniki.ru and Vkontakte.ru (a Facebook clone), dating site Mamba, link exchange Sape.ru plus Poland’s Nasza-Klasa.pl. Does its latest buy make a Facebook IPO more or less likely? Consider the case of Mail.ru, whose own likely

 

IPO was called off last year when DST upped its stake to a majority.

 

DST’s own shareholders include Arsenal football club shareholder Alisher Usmanov, Renaissance Partners, Tiger Global and Goldman Sachs, plus partners Miler, London-based Alexander Tamas and ex hedge fund boss Gregory Finger.

 

Usmanov bumped his stake up by another two percent to 32 percent this week. Russia’s internet audience is Europe’s fourth largest, behind Germany, the UK and France, April figures from comScore said Wednesday.

 

Source: http://www.paidcontent.org/entry/419-facebooks-new-russian-shareholder-planning-its-own-ipo/

 

Posted via web from Global Business News

Friday, May 29, 2009

On the Web, Streams Are Replacing Pages

By Joseph Tartakoff - Wed 27 May 2009

 

The Inside Word is a weekly feature that looks at unusual industry debates and discussions unfolding on the blogs of employees at digital-media companies.

 

Poster: John Borthwick

 

Blog name: THINK / Musings

Company: Betaworks

 

Backstory: Borthwick leads New York City-based tech investor Betaworks, whose network includes buzzy startups like Twitter, bit.ly, stocktwits and Tumblr. Borthwick blogs only occasionally but says he was moved to post this month when he noticed that companies in Betaworks portfolio were getting an increasing amount of traffic “via social distribution” networks.

 

Blog Entry: Perhaps it’s not surprising that Borthwick, given the heavy social-media component in the Betaworks portfolio, is an advocate of the “stream,” epitomized by the Facebook newsfeed and by Twitter. But in his blog post, he goes so far as to say that the stream has replaced the “page” as the metaphor for the web: “For 15 years, the primary metaphor of the web has been pages and reading,” Borthwick writes.

 

“The metaphors we used to circumscribe this possibility set were mostly drawn from books and architecture (pages, browser, sites, etc.). Most of these metaphors were static and one way. The stream metaphor is fundamentally different. [It’s] dynamic, it [doesn’t] live very well within a page and [is] still very much evolving.”

 

One implication: Since people are finding information via sites like Twitter or Facebook, website traffic will no longer always be steady, Borthwick argues. In a given month, there will be days when traffic will be way above average and sites should try to take advantage of this: “So what to do when a burst takes place? I have no real idea [what’s] going to emerge here, but cursory thoughts include making sure the author is present to manage comments etc., and build in a dynamic mechanism to alert the crowd to other related items.”

 

Post-script: In a followup exchange, we asked Borthwick what this might mean for advertisers, who are used to buying against a relatively consistent level of traffic. He said tools would emerge so that advertisers could put offers in front of crowds when they suddenly show up on a site. “It’s early days, but if the traffic flow changes, the way ad (dollars) work will shift as well,” he said.

 

Please e-mail suggestions for future editions of the Inside Word to joe@paidcontent.org

 

Photo credit: Mary Hodder

 

Source: http://www.paidcontent.org/entry/419-the-inside-word-the-web-is-not-dry/

Posted via web from Global Business News

Geithner Goes to China Hat in Hand

Beggar

By Greg Robb,

MarketWatch

 

WASHINGTON (MarketWatch) - Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner is about to get on a plane and travel half-way around the world to manage what is probably the world's worst marriage-of-convenience.

 

Mutual mistrust, competition and rivalry complicate a U.S.-China relationship that, on the other hand, has been so lucrative for both sides and the global economy. The two sides got closer during the recent recession, but there are new strains on the horizon.

 

China's currency has moved lower in recent weeks, riding on the back of the dollar. Criticism is sure to follow. With one of the few economies growing in the global recession, by all rights China's currency should be on the rise. Experts said this love/hate bilateral relationship is well-established.

 

U.S. policy towards China constantly swerves "between marriage and a nasty divorce," said Clay Lowery, a former Treasury official during the George W. Bush administration.

 

Over the past two decades, China has created an export machine that provides U.S. consumers with inexpensive goods while both American and Chinese companies benefited.

 

This has been accomplished, in part, by China keeping its currency low relative to the dollar. The byproduct is a wide bilateral trade gap and China becoming the largest foreign holder in U.S. Treasury securities.

 

China now holds $1.55 trillion in dollar assets, according to Brad Setser of the Council of Foreign Relations. As a result, China can look forward to an estimated $50 billion in interest payments on the debt this year.

 

China needs the U.S. to survive and prosper and the U.S. needs China to buy our debt, said Timothy Adams, who also served in the Bush Treasury. Washington has never been comfortable in this relationship. A debate continues at the highest levels of government whether China's rise is peaceful or a threat.

 

Beijing, on the other hand, is focused on respect and is not keen to listen to lectures from a U.S. government that has had to spend over a trillion dollars rescuing its banking sector.

 

Recession hasn't changed things

 

There had been some hope that the severe recession over the last 18 months would have altered this bilateral relationship. The theory went that with the U.S. consumer tapped out, China would focus on building up its own domestic consumer market. But experts say this hasn't happened, at least to the extent required. Instead, Chinese exporters have doubled down on the return of the U.S. consumer and have increased their capacity. Exporters appear to have political muscle in China to block meaningful reform.

 

At the same time, the U.S. budget deficit is projected to reach record levels for the next several years.

 

"We've got to hope China still has an appetite for our debt," given the "ocean of red ink" coming down the road, said Adams. Given this backdrop, the Obama administration wants to "make nice" with Beijing, said Carl Weinberg, chief economist at High Frequency Economics.

 

Geithner wants to assuage China's concerns about U.S. monetary policy and the stability of its U.S. holdings and will not push for China to strengthen its currency versus the dollar, Weinberg said.

 

"Geithner has no leg to stand on to insist on more revaluation ... and he knows this," Weinberg said.

 

Geithner is also going to China to prepare the ground for high-level talks between the two countries to be held in Washington in the latter half of the summer. The talks are modeled after the program started by former Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson. Key Cabinet officials from both countries meet to try to rescue issues from the clutches of bureaucrats.

 

Geithner and Secretary of State Hillary Clinton will share the stage, with Geithner shepherding economic issues, and Clinton handling environmental and political issues.

 

Geithner wants to be "low key" in his dealings with China, agreed Nicholas Lardy, a top China watcher in Washington for the Peterson Institute for International Economics.

 

Obama officials want to move away from what they see as the "lecturing mode" of the Bush administration, Lardy said. Congress has no appetite to fight China for fear that the tension might hurt the recovery. But if the jobless rate hits double-digits, then the focus of the public's ire may shift from Wall Street back to China, Lardy said.

 

"The rhetoric has cooled but not disappeared. It will come back," Adams said. Setser said most recent trends in the currency market are already fanning the flames. The dollar has fallen to five-month lows in currency trading, and because China's currency is pegged to the dollar, it has come down as well.

 

"China's currency has been depreciating in real terms even though it is generally thought that China's economy is going to do better than the rest of the global economy," Setser said.


So we're back at square one with the yuan tightly pegged as the dollar is weakening, just like 2002 to 2005, he said. Other Asian countries are scrambling to weaken their currencies to compete with China.

 

Dean Baker, co-director of the liberal-leaning Center for Economic and Policy Research in Washington, said that the U.S. should go so far as to try to negotiate an appropriate bilateral currency rate with China, say 5 yuan to the dollar. If the talks are not successful, the U.S. should simply set a rate.

 

He said that complaints in Congress and the White House over the past decade about China's currency have amounted to "stagecraft." Not all experts are so glum. Lardy of the Peterson Institute said China's recent stimulus package "was the gold standard in terms of its response to the global economic crisis."

 

China put money in the hands of the population, he said. Car sales, for instance, rose dramatically. If China can continue this policy, it may offset renewed tension, Lardy added. For clues on how Geithner's meeting went, Setser suggested focusing on whether there in progress on China's making a contribution to the International Monetary Fund.

 

During the Group of 20 meeting in London, U.K. Prime Minister Gordon Brown announced that China planned to contribute $40 billion to the IMF but no official announcement from China has been forthcoming.

 

A senior Treasury official told reporters that this topic may come up in Geithner's meetings. Geithner will meet with the highest level of Chinese officials on Monday and Tuesday. But both sides of the marriage are likely to keep mum about their difficulties, at least in public. In the near term, "it looks like nothing on the horizon that is dealing with these problems," noted Desmond Lachman, an expert on global economics at the American Enterprise Institute.

 

Source: http://www.marketwatch.com/story/geithner-goes-to-beijing-to-manage-bad-marriage

Posted via web from Global Business News

OPEC Set To Leave Output Unchanged


Graphic showing Opec oil production

Opec bets on recovery to boost price

By Javier Blas in Vienna

Published: May 28 2009

 

The Organisation of the Petroleum Exporting Countries delivered on Thursday its most optimistic message about the global economy and the oil market since the start of the financial crisis last summer triggered a precipitous fall in prices from a record $150 a barrel to $30.

 

“We are beginning to see light at the end of the tunnel,” Abdalla El-Badri, Opec secretary-general, said after the cartel agreed to leave its production level unchanged, betting that the global recovery would push oil prices to $75-$80 a barrel.

 

“We are seeing [oil demand in] the US picking up,” Mr El-Badri added. “But, above all, which is the most important, we are seeing demand in China and India and Asia as a whole.”

 

Because oil demand was closely correlated with economic activity, Opec’s cheerful view was a signal the global economy was slowly strengthening, analysts said.

 

Ali Naimi, Saudi minister and one of the world’s most senior energy policymakers, added to the upbeat sentiment, saying: “The price is good, the market is in good shape and the recovery is under way, so what else could we want?”

 

Oil prices rose immediately to a fresh six-month high of more than $64 a barrel.


David Kirsch, an oil market analyst at PFC Energy, said in Vienna that Opec was leaving behind its worries about the global economy, last expressed at its March meeting. “Opec is witnessing early signs of economic recovery and financial flows into commodities,” Mr Kirsch said.

 

Opec delegates said that Saudi Arabia appeared confident that the flow of money into commodities – as investors worried about a pick-up in inflation or a further weakening of the US dollar – would help the cartel to support oil prices. Speculative flows, long an Opec foe, could turn into an ally, analysts said.

 

Nonetheless, behind the scenes some Opec members such as Venezuela and Algeria expressed their unease about the precarious balance between supply and demand, and high inventories.

 

The International Energy Agency, the western countries’ oil watchdog, forecast that global oil demand would drop this year by 2.6m barrels a day, the steepest fall since 1981.

 

In addition, crude oil inventories in developed countries both onshore and floating in tankers are near record levels. Those concerns echo the scepticism of many traders in the physical market about Riyadh’s view of rising oil demand. Few analysts on Wall Street share Saudi Arabia’s forecast that oil prices would rise to $75-$80 a barrel by the end of the year.

 

Opec’s communiqué reflected the nervousness of some of its more bearish members, saying that the cartel was ready to “respond swiftly to any developments which might place oil market stability and their interest in jeopardy”.

 

At the same time, the oil cartel’s ministers “reiterated the firm commitment to the individually agreed production allocations”, a sign that the group is concerned about some member states pumping above the officially sanctioned levels.

 

The group has announced three big output cuts since September, totalling a record 4.2m barrels a day – about 5 per cent of global oil demand – but it delivered about 80 per cent of the promised reduction last month, down from 85 per cent in March.

 

The official output ceiling of Opec’s core members, excluding Iraq, stands at 24.8m b/d. Opec will review the oil market in a meeting scheduled for September 9.

 

Data from the US Energy Information Administration showed that crude oil stockpiles fell more than expected as refinery utilisation jumped. Crude stockpiles fell by 5.4m barrels, compared with the expectation for a drop of 700,000 barrels.

 

Source: http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/7c3b46ee-4b56-11de-b827-00144feabdc0.html?nclick_check=1

Posted via web from Global Business News